![]() |
Case Report
1 Department of General and Digestive Surgery, Hospital Universitario El Escorial, San Lorenzo de El Escorial, Madrid, Spain
2 Department of General and Digestive Surgery, Hospital Rey Juan Carlos, Móstoles, Madrid, Spain
3 Department of Pathological Anatomy, Hospital Universitario El Escorial, San Lorenzo de El Escorial, Madrid, Spain
Address correspondence to:
Sonia Morales Artero
C/Gerardo Diego, 31. 28232 Las Rozas, Madrid,
Spain
Message to Corresponding Author
Article ID: 100998Z01SM2019
Introduction: Fibroadenomas are the most frequent breast tumors in women. However, their location in the anogenital region is extremely rare.
Case Report: We present a case of a perianal fibroadenoma in a young woman. It was necessary the surgical treatment to reach a definitive diagnosis.
Conclusion: It’s important to highlight the glandular mammary-like tissue present in the perianal region as the origin of different lesions, in order to make an adequate differential diagnosis.
Keywords: Apocrine, Fibroadenoma, Perianal pain
Fibroadenoma (FA) is the most common breast tumor in women. Several extramammary locations have been described (gallbladder, prostate, face and eyelid) [1], while the anogenital region (perineal, perianal and vulvar) a very rare one. This tumor was traditionally considered to originate in ectopic breast tissue, as other breast tumors do; however, after van der Putte’s publication in 1991 [2], it is accepted as normal to find glandular mammary-like tissue in the anogenital region, with response to humoral stimulation owing to the transformation of eccrine glands into apocrine glands.
A 34-year-old woman with a history of polycystic ovary syndrome, reporting a one year long perianal tumor with progressive growth, with menstrual pain not responding to oral contraceptives prescribed for dysmenorrhea. She has no fever, suppuration or rectal bleeding. At rectal examination, next to the anal verge, located at 9h in genupectoral position, a 5 cm soft elastic tumor is palpated, showing no inflammatory signs. A percutaneous puncture is done, obtaining no pus. Endoanal ecography is normal. Pelvic magnetic resonance (Figure 1) shows a solid non-specific ovoid mass in the subcutaneous tissue, measuring 67 mm in its longer axis, ruling out lipoma or endometriosic implant, but consistent with an inflammatory or neoplastic mass; no abnormal lymph nodes are identified.
Under spinal anesthesia, complete excision of the lesion is achieved with security margins. The patient is discharged on the first postoperative day and no early complications occur. Macroscopically, a nodular non encapsulated well limited lesion is identified, measuring 6x4.5x1 cm, pink colour (Figure 2). Microscopically, a fibroepithelial neoformation, with a predominant stromal component made of fibroblastic type cells, displayed over a collagen matrix. The epithelial component is organized in ducts and acini with a visible and free lumen (pericanalicular pattern), and no endoluminal necrosis or calcification is identified. Signs of apocrine differentiation can be seen on the luminal epithelium in some ducts. There are no signs suggesting malignancy. Immunohistochemistry reveals activity for humoral receptors (estrogens and progesterone) on the luminal epithelium. According to the pathologic findings, a fibroadenoma with apocrine differentiation is diagnosed (Figure 3).
Anogenital FA is more frequent in women in the fourth decade of life [3]. However, perianal location is an exception. A thorough review of literature has only found 13 cases of perianal FA in women (Table 1). All the lesions have been unique, except for one case in which three simultaneous lesions were found [4]. Most of the cases presented in women of fertile age, with a median age at diagnosis of 42,7 years (27–85 years) and a median size of 3.9 cm (1.5–10 cm). In one case, the diagnosis was made incidentally on pathology after perianal fistulectomy [5]; in another case, the lesion showed a progressive growth during pregnancy [6]. Half of the lesions found are pediculated and 42.8% of them were accompanied by perianal pain or discomfort. Our case was the only one that showed pain directly related with menstruation. Time of evolution has been widely variable, from three weeks to 17 years.
Preoperative diagnosis is not easy; differential diagnosis must be made between hemorrhoids, perianal abscess, endometriosis, primary anorectal tumors and other malignant lesions of the anogenital region (Paget’s disease and invasive carcinoma) [1],[6],[7],[8],[9] [10]. Magnetic resonance and puncture for cytology may be helpful [5]. However, surgical treatment is mandatory to reach final pathologic diagnosis. This lesions are usually well limited, microscopically identical to breast FA, with glandular structures surrounded by a low cellularity, scarcely mitotic stroma [3],[5]. Most of them have estrogen and progesterone receptors. Phyllodes tumor (PT), which is more irregular and with more stromal cellularity, must be differentiated [3],[9],[10]. There are three types of PT in the breast, depending on the identification of stromal atypia: benign, low grade and high grade [3],[10]. High grade PT of the anogenital region has not been described up to now, although lesions with pathological findings of FA and PT on the same specimen have been reported [9]. Prognosis after surgical excision is excellent and no recurrences have been found in cases of FA without simultaneous PT.
In conclusion, the presence of mammary-like glands on the anogenital region has to be taken into account whenever a perianal tumor is found in women; and differential diagnosis between other more common perianal lesions must include a benign or malignant lesion of mammary tissue.
1.
Doganavsargil B, Akalin T, Yilmaz M, Kandiloglu G. Perianal fibroadenoma, case report. Am J Dermatopathol 2008;30(1):81–3. [CrossRef]
[Pubmed]
2.
Van der Putte SC. Anogenital “sweat” glands. Histology and pathology of a gland that may mimic mammary glands. Am J Dermatopathol 1991;13(6):557–67.
[Pubmed]
3.
Kazakov DV, Spagnolo DV, Kacerovska D, Michal M. Lesions of anogenital mammary-like glands: An update. Adv Anat Pathol 2011;18(1):1–28. [CrossRef]
[Pubmed]
4.
Assor D, Davis JB. Multiple apocrine fibroadenomas of the anal skin. Am J Clin Pathol 1977;68(3):397–9.
[Pubmed]
5.
Ekci B, Gokce O, Ozkan F. Apocrine fibroadenoma of the perianal region associated with perianal fistula. J Clin Med Res 2010;2(5):239–42. [CrossRef]
[Pubmed]
6.
Donati P, Amantea A. Adenoma of anogenital mammary-like glands. Am J Dermatopathol 1996;18(1):73-6.
[Pubmed]
7.
Choi WW, Tadros TS, Majmudar B. Anal fibroadenoma: Report of a common tumor type in an unusual location. South Med J 2007;100(9):914–5. [CrossRef]
[Pubmed]
8.
Ahmed S, Campbell RS, Li JH, Wang LJ, Robinson-Bostom L. Adenoma of anogenital mammary-like glands. J Am Acad Dermatol 2007;57(5):896–8. [CrossRef]
[Pubmed]
9.
Duncan JR, Kaffenberger BH, Gru A. Perianal tumor with overlap features of fibroadenoma and phyllodes tumor arising from anogenital mammary-like glands. Am J Dermatopathol 2016;38(8):639–42. [CrossRef]
[Pubmed]
10.
Kazakov DV, Spagnolo DV, Stewart CJ, et al. Fibroadenoma and phyllodes tumors of anogenital mammary-like glands: A series of 13 neoplasms in 12 cases, including mammary-type juvenile fibroadenoma, fibroadenoma with lactation changes, and neurofibromatosis-associated pseudoangiomatous stromal hyperplasia with multinucleated giant cells. Am J Surg Pathol 2010;34(1):95–103. [CrossRef]
[Pubmed]
Sonia Morales Artero - Substantial contributions to conception and design, Acquisition of data, Analysis of data, Interpretation of data, Drafting the article, Revising it critically for important intellectual content, Final approval of the version to be published
Camilo Castellón - Substantial contributions to conception and design, Acquisition of data, Analysis of data, Interpretation of data, Drafting the article, Revising it critically for important intellectual content, Final approval of the version to be published
Elena Larraz - Substantial contributions to conception and design, Acquisition of data, Analysis of data, Interpretation of data, Drafting the article, Revising it critically for important intellectual content, Final approval of the version to be published
Federico Álvarez - Substantial contributions to conception and design, Acquisition of data, Analysis of data, Interpretation of data, Drafting the article, Revising it critically for important intellectual content, Final approval of the version to be published
Montserrat Calvo - Substantial contributions to conception and design, Acquisition of data, Analysis of data, Interpretation of data, Drafting the article, Revising it critically for important intellectual content, Final approval of the version to be published
Mar De Castro - Substantial contributions to conception and design, Acquisition of data, Analysis of data, Interpretation of data, Drafting the article, Revising it critically for important intellectual content, Final approval of the version to be published
Guaranter of SubmissionThe corresponding author is the guarantor of submission.
Source of SupportNone
Consent StatementWritten informed consent was obtained from the patient for publication of this case report.
Data AvailabilityAll relevant data are within the paper and its Supporting Information files.
Conflict of InterestAuthors declare no conflict of interest.
Copyright© 2019 Sonia Morales et al. This article is distributed under the terms of Creative Commons Attribution License which permits unrestricted use, distribution and reproduction in any medium provided the original author(s) and original publisher are properly credited. Please see the copyright policy on the journal website for more information.